Session 8

1.  Provide your rubric(s). Make sure that your rubrics evaluate the quality of responses given by your students during the online discussion. Your rubrics should also address group management issues, for example, if your students post responses on time and if they follow your instruction.

Online Discussion Rubric
	Excellent 4 pts	Good 3 pts	Fair 2 pts	Poor 1 pts
Substance Explores, explains, expands upon the issue being discussed. Applies relevant course materials.	Excellent Very clear that relevant information was understood by incorporation into postings. Analyzes course concepts, theories or materials correctly, using examples or supporting evidence.	Good Somewhat clear that relevant information was understood by incorporation into postings. Applies relevant course concepts, theories, or materials correctly.	Fair Somewhat unclear that relevant information was understood by incorporation into postings Explains relevant course concepts, theories, or materials.	Poor Very unclear that relevant information was understood by incorporation into postings. Does not explain relevant course concepts, theories, or materials.
Collaboration Collaborates with fellow learners, relating the discussion to course concepts	Excellent Added several innovative ideas and information to the discussion. Provided additional insight. Asked relevant questions.	Good Provided a few new ideas and information to the discussion. Provided some additional insight. Few questions asked.	Fair Provided one new idea or item to the discussion. No additional insight. Reiterated some of peer's thoughts.	Poor No new ideas or insight added to discussion. No questions asked. Reiterated peer's thoughts.
Posting Timeliness Submits initial posts and responses according to assignment timelines	Excellent Initial submission and responses meet posting deadlines.	Good Initial submission meets posting deadline. Responses to classmates do not meet posting deadline.	Fair Inital submission one day later than deadline. Responses to classmates do not meet posting deadline.	Poor Initial submission more than one day late. Responses to classmates do not meet posting deadline, or are not submitted.
Posting Quantity Quantity of contributions	Excellent Exceeded the minimum number of postings (original post and replies)	Good Met the minimum number of postings (original post and replies)	Fair Less than the minimum number of postings (original post and at least two replies, unless otherwise defined)	Poor Original posting only
Writing Mechanics Adherence to academic spelling and grammar conventions.	Excellent No spelling, punctuation or grammar errors	Good Fewer than two spelling, punctuation or grammar errors	Fair Between 2 and 5 spelling, punctuation or grammar errors	Poor Fewer than 7, but more than 5, spelling, punctuation or grammar errors

2.  Write your delivery plan following the format below:

A.  Describe the audience to whom you will deliver your "Online Discussion" activity. Are they the same audience to whom you deliver your "Good Start"? [Remember that you will need to have at least 3 people participate in your online discussion activity. This activity will need to be delivered online.]

My audience is the same as my “Good Start” and they are 3-4 community college students from Chaffey: Stephanie Munoz, Dalia Chavez, Osmara Cortez and/or Peter Palomino .

B.  When or roughly when will you deliver activity #2 (Online Discussion)?

I will roughly delivery my activity next week.

C.  How will you show evidence of your delivery? Will you provide the URL from which viewers may see the online discussion? Or will you provide transcripts of synchronous discussion?

            I will show evidence of my delivery by providing a link to my online discussion.

Session 7

Session 4: Instructions to Resume Writing and Online Discussion

This week we will focus on efforts on our last course objective:

• Assess and analyze their personality, interests, skills, and values to identify key

            psychological characteristics whose integration into career and life planning is

            essential to the pursuit of a fulfilling and satisfying life.

• Relate knowledge gained about psychological and emotional development theory with his/her personal decision about a career.
• Examine and interpret current career/life planning literature and resources and

            synthesize with sociological trends imparting individual life choices.

• Evaluate and prioritize occupational options employing information gathered through self-assessment and career research.
• Make career/life planning decisions which lead to a fulfilling and healthy lifestyle.
• Create a cover letter, resume, and prepare for a variety of interview styles.

The goal of this session is to create a resume that will grab the interviewer’s attention and hopefully move your application to the top of the list.

Process:

1. Listen to the podcast or read the document.
2. Go back to the three careers you previously selected as interesting and worth pursuing.
3. Create a resume for one of the three careers.
4. Post your resume on your blog.
5. Post a summary on your reason(s) for your design/outline of your resume.
6.  Critique your peers' resume.

Requirements:

            (Maximum word count per post is 250)

1. Post the resume on your blog (Due Tuesday, November 19).
2. Post a summary on your reason(s) for your design/outline of your resume. (Due Tuesday, November 19).
3. Critique three other student’s resume and respond with what you found interesting about the resume and why. Then, write one suggestion your classmate can make to improve their resume. (Due Sunday, November 24).

This week your discussion will be evaluated using the following rubric:

Online Discussion Rubric
	Excellent 4 pts	Good 3 pts	Fair 2 pts	Poor 1 pts
Substance Explores, explains, expands upon the issue being discussed. Applies relevant course materials.	Excellent Very clear that relevant information was understood by incorporation into postings. Analyzes course concepts, theories or materials correctly, using examples or supporting evidence.	Good Somewhat clear that relevant information was understood by incorporation into postings. Applies relevant course concepts, theories, or materials correctly.	Fair Somewhat unclear that relevant information was understood by incorporation into postings Explains relevant course concepts, theories, or materials.	Poor Very unclear that relevant information was understood by incorporation into postings. Does not explain relevant course concepts, theories, or materials.
Collaboration Collaborates with fellow learners, relating the discussion to course concepts	Excellent Added several innovative ideas and information to the discussion. Provided additional insight. Asked relevant questions.	Good Provided a few new ideas and information to the discussion. Provided some additional insight. Few questions asked.	Fair Provided one new idea or item to the discussion. No additional insight. Reiterated some of peer's thoughts.	Poor No new ideas or insight added to discussion. No questions asked. Reiterated peer's thoughts.
Posting Timeliness Submits initial posts and responses according to assignment timelines	Excellent Initial submission and responses meet posting deadlines.	Good Initial submission meets posting deadline. Responses to classmates do not meet posting deadline.	Fair Inital submission one day later than deadline. Responses to classmates do not meet posting deadline.	Poor Initial submission more than one day late. Responses to classmates do not meet posting deadline, or are not submitted.
Posting Quantity Quantity of contributions	Excellent Exceeded the minimum number of postings (original post and replies)	Good Met the minimum number of postings (original post and replies)	Fair Less than the minimum number of postings (original post and at least two replies, unless otherwise defined)	Poor Original posting only
Writing Mechanics Adherence to academic spelling and grammar conventions.	Excellent No spelling, punctuation or grammar errors	Good Fewer than two spelling, punctuation or grammar errors	Fair Between 2 and 5 spelling, punctuation or grammar errors	Poor Fewer than 7, but more than 5, spelling, punctuation or grammar errors

Here is what it would look like on my course site: http://melissadsakoonphong.com/uploads/3/3/3/6/3336743/Career%20Exploration_Session_4.html